From the new issue's theme: Professional thinking has caused all kinds of trouble. Hannah Arendt would know. She saw it happen firsthand—how theorizing could drive people inward and lose the kind of common sense we can truly share in common. In "Hannah Arendt and the Loss of a Common World," Michael Weinman, senior fellow at the Institute and professor of philosophy and politics at Bard College Berlin, examines Arendt's acute understanding of the social and political dangers that have attended forms of critical thinking in the twentieth century that have inadvertently diminished real engagement with public life. According to Arendt, the way of repair, Weinman argues, lies not in avoiding conflicts but rather in facing our disagreements head on—together.
"There is a possible answer to the mass democratic inclination toward (what we call today) post-truth politics and the loss of a common world, an answer to the opposed tendencies toward loneliness in our (increasingly online) silos or aggregation into masses that can easily be mobilized as mobs. This answer, inspired by Arendt's exercises in political thinking, is the enactment of democratic citizenship as the exercising of judgment. While we tend to believe that we are being good pluralists by refraining from expressing our judgments about controversial matters with neighbors with whom we might disagree, Arendt challenges us to do exactly that, and precisely with those who are least likely to see things just as we do.
"Consensus is unlikely to result from entering into an exchange of conflicting judgments about, say, the proper role of government in reproductive health, the prudence of affirmative action in university admissions, or the best way to administer local elections. Such engagement, however, might do something to restore the conviction that members of our society with whom we have deep differences at least live in the same, common, world."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep a civil tongue.