I've sat through plenty of meetings where someone made a genuinely good case for UX work and got precisely nowhere. On more than one occasion in the past that someone was me. I have found myself standing in front of a slide covered in personas while the finance director quietly lost the will to live. The work was solid, my arguments were rubbish. But over the years I have learned.
You see, most in-house teams lose this argument because they make the case for UX in the language of UX, to an audience that has never once been rewarded for caring about it. So senior managers nod politely, agree that it all sounds very interesting, and then fund the project that turned up with a number attached to it.
So I want to walk through how you build a business case for UX work based on my years of mistakes. I am not necessarily talking about a formal document with a cover sheet and an approvals matrix, but any argument solid enough to get the work you need signed off.
Nobody cares about UX as much as you do
And why would they? You don't care about health and safety, and you'd glaze over inside 30 seconds if the accounts team started walking you through their reconciliation process, however lovely their diagram. Everybody has their own patch and defends their own patch, and UX happens to be yours, which means the translating is your job rather than theirs.
That means selling UX rarely involves talking about users at all, which I admit feels like a small betrayal of everything we bang on about at conferences. Yes, talking about users is how we do the work. But, talking about business risk and opportunity is how you get permission to do the work in the first place.
Risk for the comfortable, opportunity for the hungry
A good business case leads with the risks and opportunities your proposal addresses, and the framing you pick depends enormously on the mood of the organization you happen to work for.
If you're in a big, established, comfortable business, the risk of doing nothing is your strongest card, because these organizations have plenty to lose and a deep institutional fear of losing it. Talk about customers drifting to competitors with a better signup process, or support costs climbing because the website can't answer a simple question.
If the business is newer and hungrier, flip it around and sell the upside, because nobody in a fast-growing company is lying awake worrying about protecting what they already have. There the conversation is about the sales you could win, the markets you could reach, and the growth currently leaking out of a checkout nobody has looked at properly.
Work out who you actually need to convince
Before you write a word, get clear on whose signature you need, what that specific person is measured on, and how your proposal makes their year easier. Business goals are useful, but personal goals are what get budget released, and the person approving your work has targets, a boss, and a nagging worry of their own.
The emphasis shifts depending on where you work, and in my experience it breaks down roughly like this:
Commercial businesses. Pick either customer acquisition or retention and build the case around one of them rather than gesturing at both.
Government and public sector. Focus on reducing risk, avoiding the sort of failure that ends up in the press, and improving the profile of the service.
Charities and non-profits. Talk about fundraising, supporter engagement, and building the profile of the cause.
But, cost savings work almost everywhere, and they're badly underused by UX people who would rather talk about delight. Fewer support calls, less staff time spent on manual workarounds, and fewer expensive rebuilds are all things a CFO understands without any translation from you.
Use numbers, even wobbly ones
Wherever you can, tie your case to hard figures, and don't let the fact that they're estimates stop you. Be honest that they're estimates, explain the assumptions behind them, and offer to do a more detailed analysis if the decision hinges on it. A rough number invites a conversation, while no number invites a polite no.
If the maths makes you nervous, I built an ROI calculator that does the heavy lifting for you, so you can walk in with something more persuasive than a strong feeling.
Beyond the numbers, get people excited about what's possible, because approval is an emotional decision dressed up in a spreadsheet. Vibe code a rough prototype, mock up the improved journey, or build something shiny that stakeholders can see and immediately want. I've watched a scrappy 2 day prototype do more for a business case than 40 pages of analysis ever managed.
What goes into the case
Strip away the formatting and every decent business case answers the same handful of questions:
The diagnosis. What's the problem or the opportunity, described in business terms rather than UX ones.
The work. What you're proposing to actually do.
The objective. What success looks like, and how you'll know you got there.
The evidence. What research, data, or experience supports your case.
The practicalities. What needs to happen, in what order.
The resources. What you need in people, time, and money.
The first step. One small, well defined thing you can start on now.
Ask for less than you want
Those last two points are where most business cases die, usually because they ask for too much in one go. Focus on reallocating resources you already have rather than requesting new money, especially at the start, because moving a designer onto a project for 3 weeks is a much smaller decision than approving a budget line.
Don't ask anyone to sign off on the whole plan either. Build momentum with a small first step, whether that's a prototype, a limited pilot, or a focused piece of research, and make sure it's something you can deliver quickly so people see progress while they still remember agreeing to it.
Then define, up front, what results would justify committing to the rest, so the next conversation becomes a matter of pointing at evidence everyone already agreed would be convincing.
None of this is as satisfying as being handed budget because the work is obviously the right thing to do, and I spent years waiting for that to happen. It never did, so I learned to talk about money instead, and the UX work finally started getting approved.
If you've got a case to make and no idea where to start with the figures, I can actually help with the process. You can learn more here.
Ahead: Catastrophic flooding along the Nepal-China border has left more than 1,300 people missing, including hundreds of tourists. Plus, Meta agrees to put limits on kids’ screen time, and the art world loses an icon.
Families of missing loved ones ‘hoping for a miracle’
Footage shows a torrent of water hitting villages in Nepal on Wednesday. (Social media)
Families are anxiously awaiting news of loved ones missing after deadly floodwaters wiped out villages along the Nepal-China border on Wednesday.
The number of people listed as missing across both countries has climbed to 1,300, including at least 700 foreigners, dozens of whom are Americans. More than 270 people have been confirmed dead, and the toll is expected to rise.
In the aftermath of disasters like this — especially when communication networks are down in remote, hard-to-reach areas — it can take days for the full scale of the event to emerge. Some of those still unaccounted for may simply be unable to reach authorities or their relatives. “We are so, so worried, but we are hoping for a miracle,” Asmita Dahal told CNN. Her 21-year-old brother, a tour guide in the region, hasn’t been heard from since the flooding struck. For many families like hers, the agonizing wait is growing more urgent as the window to find survivors begins to narrow.
Instagram and Facebook to set time limits for young users
Meta has agreed to pay about $18 billion to settle a multistate lawsuit accusing the social media giant of intentionally designing addictive platforms that harmed young people’s mental health. The deal will also bring daily time limits for young users on Instagram and Facebook, among other changes aimed to improve online safety, the company said. Announced Wednesday, the settlement ends a landmark legal battle just over a week after a California trial began, where four states had been seeking as much as $1.4 trillion in damages. Meta, which has long rejected the states’ claims, did not admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement.
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates argued on Wednesday that artificial intelligence is more dangerous than tech CEOs are willing to admit. “AI will either be the greatest equalizer ever invented, or the worst source of injustice,” Gates wrote Wednesday in a 6,000-word essay calling for major limits on AI development. Gates isn’t the first tech leader to raise concerns about rapid advancements in AI. But his warning adds to growing worries about the actions of some AI models and potential job losses, even as the AI companies and Wall Street press full speed ahead on the technology. In his essay, Gates also proposed taxing AI and robots similarly to human workers to slow job displacement. He also wants to reserve some work exclusively for humans.
The aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt and its company of 5,000 will sail to the Middle East and is expected to be deployed for at least seven months, officials said. The move comes as the Navy deals with the fallout from the recent deployment of the USS Abraham Lincoln to the region that saw the ship spend more than 250 days at sea without a port call. That lengthy deployment raised concerns about the mental health of sailors, including reports of at least one going overboard, as well as reports of low supplies on the carrier. At the same time, President Donald Trump claims the financial strength of the US will move the country “toward a very big victory” over Iran.
Thrill-seekers braved a world-famous Six Flags rollercoaster. Then they were rushed to the hospital for emergency brain surgery.
Lindsay Clancy trial enters its final phase
Closing arguments are scheduled to take place today in the triple-murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother who argues she is not criminally responsible for the killings of her three young children. Here’s the latest.
FDA approves groundbreaking pancreatic cancer drug
A once-a-day pill could offer new hope to patients battling pancreatic cancer.
Photos: Incredible shortlisted images from Wildlife Photographer of the Year
These images were chosen from more than 65,000 entries submitted from around the world.
Yayoi Kusama, famous for her polka-dotted works, dies at 97
Japanese artist Yayoi Kusama, one of the world’s most celebrated and best-selling artists, has died. Watch this video for a look back at her life, legacy and iconic work.
01:57
Sponsored Content by FinanceBuzz
Eight legal ways to pay off debt like the rich (most people ignore #6
Tushy makes some of our all-time favorite bidets, so when we heard the brand was releasing an update to its affordable attachment, we couldn’t wait to install it. The new model has the most comfortable stream of any attachment we’ve tried, but it now features two nozzles and more adjustability.
Thanks for reading
5 Things AM is edited by CNN’s Andrew Torgan.
You are receiving this newsletter because you signed up for Five Things.
