The Art of Selling Stocks

The Daily Reckoning U.S. Edition

Home . Archives . Unsubscribe

The Daily Reckoning | Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Breaking up is the hardest thing to do...especially when it comes to investments! Chapter one of Chris Mayer’s World Right Side Up, yours to download below, Plus, crying for Argentina, sunrise opportunities in fields afar and plenty more... ------------------------------------------------------ Only 62 People Know Exactly Why These Four Companies Could Change the World Now you’re #63 “on the inside” — and you’re on the verge of raking in lasting wealth. This could go down in history as the story of our era. Click here for all the details.   Sunset in Argentina The Peaks and Valleys of a Changing World Economy   Joel Bowman Reckoning today from Buenos Aires, Argentina... “The things that happened could only have happened during a fiesta. Everything became quite unreal finally and it seemed as though nothing could have any consequences. It seemed out of place to think of consequences during the fiesta.” — The Sun Also Rises, Ernest Hemingway We began yesterday’s bitty missive with a simple enough observation: The world, it turns. From light to darkness; day to night; freedom and liberty to control and coercion. Of course, when it comes to day and night, coordinates matter. And when the spreading creep of twilight washes the late afternoon sky of one horizon, the dawn of a new day peers inquisitively over another. We were thinking about all this on our afternoon stroll through the city yesterday. The old porteños were out in the plazas, sipping their mates by the big iron gates, smoking tobacco and chatting idly amongst themselves. Their faces wore deep creases, choked with years of stillborn promises and hopes long since smothered in the still of night. Salt and pepper whiskers. Unkempt hair, longish below upturned collars. Sunset in Buenos Aires. This was not always the case. The world has turned. From the mid-1800s, following the ousting of Juan Manuel de Rosas, through to until the 1930-40s, Argentina thrived as a bastion of relatively free commerce and trade. Spurred by many of the ideas encapsulated in Juan Bautista Alberdi’s Bases for the Political Organization of the Argentine Republic, the South American nation became the envy of its neighbors. Echoing the writings of Jefferson and Madison, Alberdi was an ardent defender of what he saw as unalienable rights, including the rights to earn and own property, without let or hindrance from the state. At the time, his thoughts on the matter were considered revolutionary: Today we must strive for free immigration, liberty of commerce, railroads, the navigation of our rivers, the tilling of our soil, free enterprise... Our revolutionary wars sought to establish liberty from outside oppression...what we now need is liberty within... Our leaders want both glory and liberty, and the two are contradictory... And so the fruits of these ideas sprung forth. By the turn of the 20th century, Argentina was the 8th most prosperous nation on earth. Only Belgium, Switzerland, Britain and a handful of former English colonies — including the United States — were more favorably positioned, economically. In 1913, Argentina’s bustling, cosmopolitan capital, Buenos Aires, had the thirteenth highest per capita telephone penetration rate in the world. Her per capita income was, around this time, 50% higher than in Italy, almost twice that of Japan and five times greater than its northern neighbor, Brazil. Argentina’s industry churned out quality textiles and frigorificos (refrigerated ships) carried her prized beef from the fertile plains of the pampas to the farthest reaches of the known world. Argentina rose with the arc of the century...and fell with it too. Eventually, indifferently, came the long shadows of afternoon, and with them a costly era of protectionist policies at home and increased competition abroad from the post-WWII, export-led economies. The temptation to meddle became too much for the liberty- fed pupils of Alberdi to resist. War, currency debasement, civil unrest, military rule and the usual accelerant of politicians, equal parts corrupt and inept, conspired to stultify Argentina’s vast potential. Almost without a trace, and with precious few really understanding why, the warm glow retreated from the plazas. Then, evening fell. “I cannot walk through the suburbs in the solitude of the night without thinking that the night pleases us because it suppresses idle details, just as our memory does.” — Jorge Luis Borges. Even now, standing atop a half century of hard won disaster, of blood and of suffering untold, the Argentine state seems only to grow in its arrogance. Long is this darkness...and long-suffering its good people. P.S. Peering only at this one corner of the globe, during this one particular century, one could be forgiven for thinking the human species had simply given up on reason and embraced instead the mysticism of our cave dwelling ancestors...that there were no opportunities worthy of investment, neither of time nor capital, on this forsaken orb. Tracing Argentina’s history from the time of Juan Bautista Alberdi through to the retarding disaster occupying the Casa Rosada this evening, we find a clear comparison with many other, similarly declining nations elsewhere. But as we keep saying, the world turns... And with this revolution comes sunrise opportunities in places once thought uninvestable. Colombia, for example, was considered the basket case of South America at the turn of the new century. After the major ratings agencies cut her sovereign credit rating to “junk,” Colombia underwent a kind of non-voluntary austerity program. Few investors wanted anything to do with the place. Today, the story is very, very different. Your editor visited the country just last year back...as did Chris Mayer, Addison Wiggin and The 5’s Dave Gonigam. In a recent interview on RT’s Capital Account, Chris Mayer identified Colombia’s farmland as a “virtually untapped resource,” largely because it had been closed off for so long due to drug lord infighting and territorial disputes, the vast majority of which has now abated. “There’s huge opportunity as that acreage comes online,” he said. The sun rises elsewhere, too. China and her satellite countries. India likewise. Pockets of South America. Deep inside Africa. Selected markets across the Middle East... In his new book, World Right Side Up, Chris recalls his boots-on- ground research, spanning dozens of countries across six continents, where he met with CEOs, local expert and market insiders, to uncover the dawning opportunities of tomorrow. We’re excited to invite Fellow Reckoners to Chris’ digital book launch party tomorrow, where Laissez-Faire Book’s Jeffrey Tucker will sit down with the author to pick his brain about a world, right side up. We encourage you to join us, online, by simply RSVP-ing here. Attendees will enjoy the exclusive opportunity to claim an autographed copy of Chris’ book plus three free months of his bestselling newsletter, Capital & Crisis — an offer that’s only available to Laissez-Faire Today readers. In addition, you’ll be able, immediately, to download Chapter 1 of Chris’ new book, World Right Side Up. Again, here’s the link. We hope you can join us. The Daily Reckoning Presents The Art of Selling Stocks   Chris Mayer I got a question from a self-described “loyal reader” of Capital & Crisis. I began to answer it, and my response turned into a mini- treatise on the art of selling stocks. Here is the question: “Chris: I see a remarkable contradiction in your latest issue of Capital & Crisis. At the outset, you extol the virtues of [the successful investor Thomas] Phelps, who was an advocate of buy right and hold long, with the rest of your strategies, which seem based on sell half, take profits, and let the rest run. As you publish the bookkeeping on how long you have to stay in on an initial investment, undisturbed, to make a big profit at a given rate of return, why not make an equal effort to bookkeep what happens to your initial investment and final returns when you take half out every time it doubles? Let’s see what it makes you or costs you to do it that way. It seems to me that the take-profits approach is an admission of a lack of confidence in self or the company, but somehow feels like falling down stairs every time you almost reach the top.” Fair questions. Let me start by saying that selling is the hardest thing to do well as an investor. I don’t think anyone does it well consistently, and that includes the whole slew of investing greats — past and present — that I’ve studied. Everyone has sold something only to see it rise higher. And everyone has held onto something only to give back lots of apparent gains. Second, remember that Phelps didn’t say hold onto stocks blindly. He wrote: “My advice to buy right and hold on is intended to counter unproductive activity, not to recommend putting them away and forgetting them.” Now let’s talk about taking partial profits. At Capital & Crisis, I don’t automatically advise selling half when a stock doubles. I’m against mechanical rules of all kinds. I use our judgment. When a stock is fully valued or close to it, I tend to let it go — or at least a part of it. That’s often the case after a quick double or so. If it is still undervalued, I tend to keep it. Canadian Natural Resources (NYSE:CNQ), for example, has doubled twice for my subscribers over the time I suggested buying it. But I have never suggested taking any money off the table. This is simply because CNQ has tremendous assets in the ground, and I don’t think the stock has ever fully reflected that value. Another example: Ensco doubled, but I did not suggest selling half. Instead, I suggested closing out the entire position for a 132% gain after it made a big acquisition I didn’t like. Sometimes, selling half is costly, as you say. Selling half on GTLS looks like a bad idea now — I suggested selling half the position for a 112% gain, and the remaining half is up 203%! Other times, selling half looks smart. I suggested selling half of Northwest Pipe, booking a 120% gain. Eventually, as circumstances changed, I recommended selling the rest of the position. But by that time, the stock had fallen to a much lower price. Even so, both sells looked pretty decent in hindsight, as the stock remains below the lowest level at which I recommended selling, and overall, that investment booked a healthy gain of 65%. Other great investors follow similar approaches. The late Peter Cundill, for example, was a great investor who was a fan of taking half of a position off the table after it doubled. The book to read is There’s Always Something to Do: The Peter Cundill Investment Approach by Christopher Risso-Gill. In the book, there is the story about how Cundill bought Tiffany & Co. for $11 and sold it when it hit his valuation estimate ($19 per share) a year later. The problem was that six months later, it got a bid for $50. As Risso-Gill writes: “This outcome prompted considerable discussion among the Cundill Value Fund board members over the question of how to deal with the problem of when to sell. Peter himself could come up with no absolutely satisfactory proposal or formula. In the end, the solution turned out to be something of a compromise: The fund would automatically sell half of any given position when it had doubled, in effect thereby writing down the cost of the remainder to zero, with the fund manager then left with full discretion as to when to sell the balance.” Cundill later expressed it this way, “When a stock doubles, sell half — then what you have is a free position. Then it becomes more of an art form. When you sell depends on individual circumstances.” I think this is a reasonable approach and seems to navigate that treacherous corridor between fear and greed, between risk and reward. I don’t think such decisions should be automatic, but you should think about selling when valuations are full. A good case study of failing to sell part or all of a fully valued stock is in the latest quarterly letter of the Third Avenue Real Estate Fund (TAREF), managed by Michael Winer and Jason Wolf. It was a good letter, and I respect the managers for admitting and discussing their error. TAREF owned a big position in Forest City Enterprises. It was a terrific investment for the fund. Over the 10 years ending Sept. 30, 2008, Forest City delivered a return of 16.7% annualized. However, for the three years ending Sept. 30, 2011, the stock generated an annualized loss of 29.4%! Messrs. Winer and Wolf write: “After 10 years of providing shareholders with stellar returns, most of those returns have been given back... So what happened?” Lots of things changed with the company over that span, as you might imagine, and they discuss them. But Winer and Wolf conclude that they made a mistake not trimming the position in 2006 and 2007. “The stock traded at all-time highs, and it became more difficult to justify the stock price without stretching our valuation estimates.” Because of this experience, they have adopted a revised approach. This includes being “more proactive in reducing and/or eliminating holdings based on price appreciation or to reallocate into securities with more-attractive valuations.” Winer and Wolf sum up: “These proactive portfolio adjustments do not represent a change in fund management’s fundamental approach to analyzing businesses and the prices of their securities, nor does it mean that we are now engaged in ‘market timing.’ We time our entry and exit from securities positions based upon fundamental valuations, not on expectations of price movements in the market.” I think that is well said. And it’s essentially how I think about the problem. In the end, what you want to do is go in as a buy-and-hold investor. You want the effects of compounding to work for you, as well as the favorable tax treatment that goes along with buy-and-hold. So I think it is important to enter every new investment with a buy-and- hold mentality. Even modest rates of return pile up to extraordinary heights over time. But you also want to be alert to when your thesis is no longer true. Back in May 2005, I visited Ralph Wanger in Chicago. Wanger, if you don’t know, was another great investor. He led the Acorn Fund to market-beating returns over a 26-year stretch. He spent two hours with me, just talking about his philosophy of investing. I loved it and included my summary of the interview in my first book, Invest Like a Dealmaker. Wanger’s sell discipline was pretty simple: Sell when your reason for owning the stock is no longer true. This is probably my favorite reason to sell. When the main thesis for owning the stock vanishes, it’s often a good time to go. If a great balance sheet is one of the reasons you own something, for example, and it does a deal that makes the balance sheet weak, then it’s time to go. Or if you bought a stock because of a big gap between the stock price and NAV and that gap closes, then it’s time to at least think about selling. There are also portfolio considerations to think about. If I need to sell something cheap to buy something cheaper, then I will. Some regular trimming is good, I find, to stay invested in the best and most-convincing ideas. This makes evaluating selling hard, too, because maybe what I sold continued to do well, but maybe what I bought did a lot better. So this is a long answer. But believe me; I’ve given the art of selling a lot of thought. I track every sell I’ve ever recommended to my subscribers, with the idea of trying to learn something from it. The bottom line: There is no magic way to sell to ensure maximum gains every time out. I think anytime you sell, you could cost yourself money if that stock turns out to be a big winner. I understand that risk. On the other hand, as Third Avenue shows, there are also risks in getting too complacent about a holding. When the market gives you a great price to sell, you should be willing to at least think about reducing your position. As long as valuations remain reasonable, though, you may hold a stock indefinitely as the stock and the value of the business grow together over time. Also, we don’t have to be perfect in holding onto everything we buy in aiming for Phelps’ 100-to-1 returns. The main idea is to know how those big returns happened and what investors had to do to get them. Phelps summed it up best. “Just as a slight change in a golfer’s grip and stance may improve his game, so a little more emphasis on buying for keeps, a little more determination not to be tempted to sell... may fatten your portfolio. In Alice in Wonderland, one had to run fast in order to stand still. In the stock market, the evidence suggests, one who buys right must stand still in order to run fast.” Regards, Chris Mayer, for The Daily Reckoning Joel’s Note: As we mentioned above, Fellow Reckoners are invited to join us for the digital launch party of Chris’ new book, World Right Side Up. Attendees will also have first dibs on goodies like: An autographed copy of World Right Side Up: Investing Across Six Continents for only $26.00. Continued coverage of the picks Chris offers in the webinar for the next 90 days. Plus, you’ll be on Chris’ personal email list, and each week he’ll alert you to any new opportunities he’s tracking. Join us online tomorrow. Details Here. --------------------------------------------------------- Here at The Daily Reckoning, we value your questions and comments. If you would like to send us a few thoughts of your own, please address them to your managing editor at joel@dailyreckoning.com   World oil production is about to be shaken to its core... You won’t believe which nation analysts at Wall Street’s biggest banks expect to become the world’s biggest energy producer by 2017 — or the effect it will have on America... our economy... our future... Click here to see who is set to become the new king of oil — and how you can use the news to go for big profits as early as this MAY!   How to Engender the Return of a Bull Market How Austerity Hinders an Economic Recovery Opposing Trends in Debt and GDP Growth Chinese Imports Remain Robust MAS to Adjust Monetary Policy? Calls for QE3 on Disappointing Jobs Data The Daily Reckoning: Now in its 11th year, The Daily Reckoning is the flagship e-letter of Baltimore-based financial research firm and publishing group Agora Financial, a subsidiary of Agora Inc. The Daily Reckoning provides over half a million subscribers with literary economic perspective, global market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Published daily in six countries and three languages, each issue delivers a feature-length article by a senior member of our team and a guest essay from one of many leading thinkers and nationally acclaimed columnists. Cast of Characters: Bill Bonner Founder Addison Wiggin Publisher Eric Fry Editorial Director Joel Bowman Managing Editor The Mogambo Guru Editor Rocky Vega Editor Additional articles and commentary from The Daily Reckoning on: Twitter Facebook DR iPhone APP To end your Daily Reckoning e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Daily Reckoning, cancel your free subscription. If you are you having trouble receiving your Daily Reckoning subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by whitelisting the Daily Reckoning. © 2010-2012 Agora Financial, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This newsletter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the World Wide Web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Agora Financial, LLC. 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized investment advice. A lthough our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice.We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation.Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.