| You are receiving this email because you signed up to receive our free e-letter, or you purchased a product or service from its publisher, The Oxford Club. If you are having trouble viewing this email, click here to view it in your browser. |
|  | Brought to you by The Oxford Club | Friday, December 2, 2016 |
The Truth About "Set It and Forget It" Investing
 Transcript
This week's "Slap in the Face" Award goes out to all the folks - and there have been a lot of them, including Warren Buffett and his heirs - who have bought into the passive investing "set it and forget it" magic.
And it has been a real buying frenzy. But I'm afraid there's no set or forget magic happening there.
Ten years ago, 84% of funds and ETFs were actively managed. Today, that number sits at 66%. That marketing machine for passive investing has been going 24/7.
For several years, I've been watching this stampede. And in the back of my mind (with 33 years in the markets), I've been thinking this is too much, too good, too fast. Something has to be amiss here. Nothing works this well, this magically.
Well, the numbers are coming out on this new "can't lose" idea, and it isn't magic anymore.
It seems the same problems the little guys had with actively managed funds are haunting them in passive funds and ETFs, too... | | Huge Dividend Cuts!
2016 may be the year of the dividend cut.
It started late last year with energy companies like Kinder Morgan, which cut 74%... and Marathon Oil, which cut 76%.
But it's hitting companies outside energy as well, like Wynn Resorts, which made a 67% dividend cut, and CenturyLink, which cut its dividend 25%.
So which companies could be next on the chopping block? There's a tool you can use to help you find out. Just type in the company name. Here's how you can access it today. | | |
Like chasing performance; Looks like all the small investor is doing is buying into passive funds and ETFs after big run-ups - which essentially amounts to buying high and selling low. Oh, and dumping when the markets go against them.
And what is so passive about these funds when they have to sell a stock at the bottom - when a company is dropped from an index - and buy the new replacement at highs? This is what's happening.
And it seems most investors are trading them just like stocks... with the same awful market timing. The "buy high, sell low" mentality has never worked.
Do I think passive funds are worthless? No, they are cheaper. That's a positive. If you can avoid all the same old losing behaviors, which we obviously can't, they have their place. And you will make money if you don't chase performance and don't buy after a run-up like we just saw. You wait for a big sell-off, and you can leave your stocks alone.
But we can't!
As has always been the case, the little guy cannot get out of his own way. We could screw up a one-car funeral.
This is getting worse, not better. And there are proven ways to stop the bleeding, but the only thing anyone seems willing to buy is magic.
Good investing,
Steve | Recent Articles From Wealthy Retirement |
|
 |
|
| | |
|
The Oxford Club is a financial publisher that does not offer any personal financial advice or advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment for any specific individual. Members should be aware that although our track record is highly rated by an independent analysis and has been legally reviewed, investment markets have inherent risks and there can be no guarantee of future profits. The stated returns may also include option trades. 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep a civil tongue.