Good morning. We're covering Republicans and the border bill — as well as Trump, Michigan and vintage sportswear.
Harder to enterThe United States has had a porous border with Mexico for decades, and the situation has worsened in the past few years, with more than 10,000 people entering the U.S. on some days. Many then remain for years, even without a visa or citizenship. Mayors, governors, and immigration experts — as well as voters — have long urged Congress to fix the problem. This week, a bipartisan group of senators released a plan for doing so. And for anybody who has grown cynical about Washington, the plan offered reasons for both surprise and further cynicism. The surprising part is that productive bipartisanship seems to be alive, even on an issue as divisive as immigration. A wide range of experts say that the Senate plan — negotiated by James Lankford, an Oklahoma Republican; Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat; and Kyrsten Sinema, an Arizona independent — would strengthen border security and reduce illegal immigration. The measure has the support of business lobbying groups as well as the organization representing the mayors of every U.S. city with a population above 30,000. The labor union for border-patrol agents, which endorsed Donald Trump in 2020, supports the plan. So do the editorial boards of The Washington Post, which leans left, and The Wall Street Journal, which is deeply conservative. "This doesn't fix everything," Andrew Selee, president of the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, told me, "but it goes a long way to creating an institutional structure that makes sense." What, then, is the cause for further cynicism about Washington partisanship? Despite the bill's bipartisan roots and all the praise it's received, its chances of passage look slim. Political benefitsMany Republicans, including Trump and members of Congress, have decided to oppose the plan for political reasons. They think they are likely to do better in this year's elections if the immigration problem festers and they can blame Biden. "Let me tell you," Troy Nehls, a House Republican from Texas, told CNN last month, "I'm not willing to do too damn much right now to help a Democrat and to help Joe Biden's approval rating." Republicans justify their opposition mostly by pointing to one provision: an emergency measure that would forces the president to virtually shut the southern border when undocumented daily migrant encounters rise above 5,000. This measure, the critics say, would authorize 5,000 illegal entries every day. But that claim is misleading: By the same logic, the current system allows unlimited daily entries. Even more important, the Senate proposal includes many other measures to make entry harder. Among them:
Together, these measures would shift the calculus for potential migrants. Because the chances of illegal entry would fall, fewer people would likely try — and more would instead try a legal pathway. Biden's borderRepublicans do have other legitimate reasons to criticize Democrats on immigration. Since Trump's presidency, many Democrats have embraced the idea of a more open border. If you want to understand the extent of the shift, I recommend reading the party's 2020 platform: It talks almost exclusively about steps to expand immigration, even outside of legal channels. Biden, who was once a moderate on immigration, is part of the change. As a presidential candidate, he signaled that he would welcome many more arrivals. As president, he loosened the standards for asylum. Combined with political turmoil in parts of Latin America, the strong U.S. economy and other factors, Biden's approach fed the migration surge. "There are a lot of people coming because they're pretty sure that they can get in and stay," Selee said. Now, though, Biden has recognized the downsides of his initial policies. He has embraced a bipartisan immigration bill that includes many Republican priorities and few Democratic ones. (In exchange, Democrats insisted on aid for Ukraine.) As Carl Hulse, The Times's chief Washington correspondent, put it, Democrats made "substantial — almost unheard-of — concessions on immigration policy without insisting on much in return." Republicans have largely won the recent debate over immigration. Polls show most voters prefer their approach. And nonpartisan experts say the Senate plan would improve the situation, using the policies Republicans have long advocated. Yet those same Republicans are now blocking tougher border security from becoming reality. For more
Nevada Primary
Trump's Court Cases
More on Politics
Middle East
International
Business
Other Big Stories
Opinions The MAGA right's conspiratorial feud with Taylor Swift shows how weird the movement has become, David French writes. Here are columns by Thomas Edsall on Biden vs. Trump and Bret Stephens on colonialism. Discover more of the insight you value in The Morning. The Times is filled with information and inspiration every day. So gain unlimited access to everything we offer — and save with this introductory offer.
A pair of lêkê: In Ivory Coast, plastic sandals are the preferred gear for pickup soccer — and almost everything else. Staying power: Los Angeles has struggled to establish lasting dance companies. Several young outfits are trying hard to change that. Commiserating: Hundreds of journalists have been laid off in the last month. Last week, they gathered to grieve at the National Press Club. Lives Lived: Clyde Taylor was a leading figure in Black studies in the 1970s and '80s, identifying and elevating Black cinema as an art form. He died at 92.
Teaming up: ESPN, Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery are joining forces to create a sports streaming app, expected to launch in the fall. M.L.B.: Clayton Kershaw will return to the Dodgers next year. He spent the offseason deciding between Los Angeles and the Rangers, his hometown team. Basketball: Caitlin Clark's competitiveness, no-look passes and 3-point bombs have made Iowa games a must-see. What happens when she leaves?
Fan favorites: Google search interest in vintage N.F.L. items has nearly quadrupled in the last year — with the most intense interest in Missouri, home of the Kansas City Chiefs (and Taylor Swift's boyfriend). The market for vintage sports apparel is growing, as fans seek looks that stand out. "If you have a grandpa or grandma who is a sports fan, and they have a piece from when they were growing up, that is something you have to get your hands on," said Lily Shimbashi of Sportsish, a pop-culture newsletter and podcast for female sports fans. "That is so valuable right now." More on culture
Feed a crowd with the cheesy, crunchy Tex-Mex classic known as Frito Pie. Clean your ears without cotton swabs. Stop mindlessly scrolling on your phone. Declutter your fridge.
Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangrams were coffined, confide, confided, confidence and confined. And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Sudoku and Connections. Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.
|
This site is an experiment in sharing news and content. Almost everything here came from email newsletters.
Sponsor
2024/02/07
The Morning: Republicans against border enforcement
@
05:27
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Label Cloud
Technology
(1464)
News
(793)
Military
(646)
Microsoft
(542)
Business
(487)
Software
(394)
Developer
(382)
Music
(360)
Books
(357)
Audio
(316)
Government
(308)
Security
(300)
Love
(262)
Apple
(242)
Storage
(236)
Dungeons and Dragons
(228)
Funny
(209)
Google
(194)
Cooking
(187)
Yahoo
(186)
Mobile
(179)
Adobe
(177)
Wishlist
(159)
AMD
(155)
Education
(151)
Drugs
(145)
Astrology
(139)
Local
(137)
Art
(134)
Investing
(127)
Shopping
(124)
Hardware
(120)
Movies
(119)
Sports
(109)
Neatorama
(94)
Blogger
(93)
Christian
(67)
Mozilla
(61)
Dictionary
(59)
Science
(59)
Entertainment
(50)
Jewelry
(50)
Pharmacy
(50)
Weather
(48)
Video Games
(44)
Television
(36)
VoIP
(25)
meta
(23)
Holidays
(14)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep a civil tongue.