Good morning. Today, my colleague Nick Corasaniti explains the preparations for a potential post-election legal fight. We're also covering a school shooting in Georgia, a rape trial in France and robot taxis. —David Leonhardt
The other battleThere are some big clashes coming in November, both before and after Election Day. Donald Trump and his allies have spent years sowing doubts about the integrity of American elections. They've falsely claimed, including through lawsuits, that voter rolls are full of ineligible voters and that mail ballots are often improperly counted. They've installed sympathetic officials at the state and local level who are ready to act on these accusations. They have hundreds of lawyers on standby. At the same time, Democrats and voting rights organizations are preparing to counter such efforts. They've revamped a nationwide voter protection team and built a legal army of their own. Polls suggest the presidential contest will be close. In every state where the margin is small, both sides expect a post-election battle over the outcome. (Since 2020, local officials in eight states have refused to certify various results.) The maelstrom could endanger the swift outcome that many voters expect. I've spent years reporting on the gathering storm. In today's newsletter, I'll describe what it could look like. The challengesAmerican elections don't all look the same. Each state runs its own election, meaning that each state will likely face its own unique set of legal challenges in November. Mail ballots have emerged as targets in Pennsylvania and Nevada. The manual that governs elections in Arizona faces multiple lawsuits. Republicans say the voter rolls in several states, including Michigan, are improperly maintained. Controversies could arise in any of those places. But the likeliest source of trouble at the moment is Georgia, which embodies Republicans' two-pronged approach: They've set up new hurdles to voting and a process to stall — or even outright avoid — certifying the results if Trump loses. (In certification, local election officials are like scorekeepers at a football game, tallying up the points from each quarter to make a final, official score.) Georgia Republicans passed a host of new election laws beginning in 2021. One changed the makeup of the State Election Board, taking power from the secretary of state — Brad Raffensperger, who declined to help Trump overturn the last election. Lawmakers can now appoint a majority of members. (I'll return to this in a minute.) Another law expanded the ability for citizens to challenge a voter's eligibility. Right-wing activist networks in states beyond Georgia, such as Michigan and Nevada, have been filing tens of thousands of citizen-led mass challenges. The new laws could fuel a post-election dispute. Trump's allies might claim, for instance, that unresolved challenges or improperly maintained voter rolls are evidence of illegal votes. Courts, secretaries of state and law enforcement have traditionally solved those issues, because local officials are not referees; in nearly every state, they must sign off on elections by a specific deadline. But this year, right-wing activists hope to assert greater control over certification, allowing them to hunt for fraud or delay the result.
In 2024 alone, local election officials in Nevada, Michigan and Pennsylvania have refused to certify primary elections, though they've never overturned results. In Georgia, a crucial swing state, the State Election Board could equip county board members to do the same. Using their new 3-2 majority there, Republican appointees ruled that officials could conduct "reasonable inquiry" into elections before certifying the results. Democrats worry they will use this new power to point to any irregularities and defend a refusal to certify. Trump said the new Election Board members were "pitbulls fighting for honesty, transparency and victory." In a worst-case scenario, officials in any of these states could blow past the Dec. 11 deadline to submit their final certified results, throwing the election into a legal gray area. That could give their allies in Congress political cover to reject slates of electors and overturn the election result. The counteroffensiveIn previous cycles, Democrats had an expansive team of lawyers and volunteers on what's known as a "voter protection" unit. This year, they've moved those people inside the legal apparatus of Kamala Harris's campaign. They've also hired dozens of lawyers in battleground states. At the same time, the Republican National Committee has a legal team of hundreds. They work with local lawyers in key swing states. Allied outside groups are also joining the battle. The sides have already tussled in dozens of lawsuits this year, arguing over mail ballots and voter rolls. But they've also zeroed in on certification in the battlegrounds of Arizona, Nevada and Georgia. Democrats have asked courts to require local officials to certify elections. Trump allies want those officials to have discretion over whether to certify. Two lawsuits in Georgia are testing these ideas. In other states, such as Arizona, courts have agreed with Democrats that both local and state officials must certify the vote by established deadlines. Even as some voters will begin to receive absentee ballots starting tomorrow, much of the legal picture remains unsettled. New lawsuits are filed regularly, and nearly every court decision is immediately appealed. An informal judicial doctrine, known as the Purcell principle, urges judges not to change rules close to an election, but it is not binding. Just last week, a Pennsylvania court ruled that misdated mail ballots could be counted. By Monday, Republicans had already filed an appeal. More on the election
Georgia School Shooting
Politics
Middle East
More International News
Other Big Stories
Opinions Mexico's president wants judges to be elected by popular vote. That could give political donors influence over rulings, Amrit Singh and Adriana Garcia write. Here are columns by Thomas Edsall on polarization, and Pamela Paul on subway safety. Subscribe Today The Morning highlights a small portion of the journalism that The New York Times offers. To access all of it, become a subscriber with this introductory offer.
Technology: A self-driving car company owned by Amazon is deploying robot taxis without steering wheels. The vehicles still need help from humans hundreds of miles away. South Africa: A beauty pageant contestant's Nigerian heritage set off a national debate about nationality and, ultimately, xenophobia. Ask Well: "Can I lower my cholesterol without taking a statin?" Lives Lived: Jim Riswold's ads for Nike — including a series starring Michael Jordan and Spike Lee — redrew the playing field for product endorsements and propelled athletic footwear into the cultural stratosphere. Riswold died at 66.
Tennis: Jessica Pegula is through to the semifinals at the U.S. Open after defeating the No. 1 seed, Iga Swiatek. N.F.L.: The season officially kicks off tonight as the Baltimore Ravens visit the Kansas City Chiefs. Read about Baltimore's Lamar Jackson. W.N.B.A.: Caitlin Clark became the fastest player in league history to reach 100 3-pointers in a season. Our columnist argues she should share the Rookie of the Year award with Angel Reese.
Nearly 61 years ago, Dale Carpenter Sr., a businessman, captured a chaotic scene in Dallas in the aftermath of John F. Kennedy's assassination: the president's convertible speeding on the highway toward Parkland Hospital, a Secret Service agent sprawled on the back. Carpenter's video, which is just over a minute long and has only been seen by a few people, will be auctioned this month. It's estimated to be worth more than $100,000. More on culture
Combine two popular desserts with chewy brownie cookies. Clean a stroller.
Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangram was polygamy. And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Sudoku, Connections and Strands. Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.
|
This site is an experiment in sharing news and content. Almost everything here came from email newsletters.
Sponsor
2024/09/05
The Morning: The coming election legal battles
@
05:27
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Label Cloud
Technology
(1464)
News
(793)
Military
(646)
Microsoft
(542)
Business
(487)
Software
(394)
Developer
(382)
Music
(360)
Books
(357)
Audio
(316)
Government
(308)
Security
(300)
Love
(262)
Apple
(242)
Storage
(236)
Dungeons and Dragons
(228)
Funny
(209)
Google
(194)
Cooking
(187)
Yahoo
(186)
Mobile
(179)
Adobe
(177)
Wishlist
(159)
AMD
(155)
Education
(151)
Drugs
(145)
Astrology
(139)
Local
(137)
Art
(134)
Investing
(127)
Shopping
(124)
Hardware
(120)
Movies
(119)
Sports
(109)
Neatorama
(94)
Blogger
(93)
Christian
(67)
Mozilla
(61)
Dictionary
(59)
Science
(59)
Entertainment
(50)
Jewelry
(50)
Pharmacy
(50)
Weather
(48)
Video Games
(44)
Television
(36)
VoIP
(25)
meta
(23)
Holidays
(14)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep a civil tongue.