|
February 3, 2025
|
|
|
| By Neel V. Patel Staff Editor, Opinion |
|
A couple weeks ago I woke up on a Monday morning with a fever of 100.4 — far from dangerously high, but enough to keep me in bed. The following day was marginally better, but my fever hadn't subsided at all and a stinging headache was starting to form. I made an appointment at an urgent care clinic down the block.
Even on a Tuesday afternoon, things were quite busy. And as far as I could tell, there was only one doctor working the clinic. As a new patient, form after form needed to be filled out. Nurses needed to ask preliminary questions, and as I started to tick off what was wrong with me, I began to regret making the appointment. I was basically listing off all the symptoms associated with a respiratory infection — a nasty one, sure, but nothing really out of the ordinary. Did I really need to get checked out by a doctor just so they could tell me to continue taking it easy?
Heavy on my fever-addled mind was a guest essay I had been editing before I fell sick. Written by the cardiologist Eric Topol and the A.I. researcher Pranav Rajpurkar, it explores what kind of role artificial intelligence could play in medical care, especially as its capabilities improve and even surpass those of doctors in certain cases.
And so I kept thinking, as I sat in the examination room aching and struggling to sit up, that my predicament might be an example of a case that could be delegated to A.I. I had a good idea what was wrong with me and how to manage my symptoms. What I was looking for was basically someone — or something — to assure me I wasn't missing anything critical. Perhaps someday soon, a properly trained A.I. could do that, while the busy doctor focused on individuals who needed more time and attention.
It was a strange realization to come to. I'm often critical of the kind of tech enthusiasts who claim A.I. will improve every facet of our lives. And yet, I knew A.I. in this case could be an asset to both me and the doctor I was waiting for. Topol and Rajpurkar, in their essay, lay out some ideas for how that could work.
Read more:
Here's what we're focusing on today:
We hope you've enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times.
Games Here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle and Spelling Bee. If you're in the mood to play more, find all our games here.
Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com.
If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep a civil tongue.