Sponsor

2012/02/23

It's Not Their Money, It's Yours

Energy and Capital (images are being blocked)
Having trouble viewing this issue? Click here.
Refer a Friend to Energy and Capital.
It's Not Their Money, It's Yours
By Keith Kohl | Thursday, February 23rd, 2012
Keith Kohl

When it comes to cheap energy, we're spoiled.

There's really no other way to put it.

What's more, our access to cheap energy is one of the primary reasons for our success.

It's a love affair that began more than a century ago during the early stages of the U. S. oil industry.

Prior to that, we were paying exorbitant sums for oil...

Advertisement

Iran's Threats Could Make You Rich!

It's simple: Tension in the Middle East drives up energy prices.

This also makes the share prices of certain North American companies skyrocket — handing early investors like you massive gains.

The companies that stand to profit the most are outlined in this free report. 


In the early to mid-1800s, we weren't drilling into U.S. soil to satisfy our demand.

A flourishing whaling industry provided this country with fuel to burn.

At the time, a gallon of sperm oil — popularly used for lamp oils, candles and such — cost consumers about $2.00. By today's standards, that comes out to around $200 a gallon.

In other words, it wasn't cheap. (And let's call to mind the environmental toll this method took.)

So when kerosene entered the scene as a much cheaper alternative, you can imagine the collective sigh of relief from consumers — and the ocean.

By the 1860s, more than thirty kerosene plants were up and running in the United States. Kerosene lamps were so much more inexpensive, they replaced the use of whale oil practically overnight.

Of course, kerosene had been overtaken by electricity as the main source of lighting by the end of the 19th century.

But the petroleum industry managed to survive:

demand energy stuff

Today the United States finds itself once again at a crossroads with cheap energy.

But it's coming from a different cheap (for now), plentiful source: natural gas.

Forget the Government Red Tape

Cheap energy has been so long part of American history, it's ingrained in our economy, our culture, our lifestyle.

And we can see how much it weighs on the minds of politicians.

Energy Secretary Steven Chu was questioned extensively during the budget hearing last week as the topic of exporting our abundant source of natural gas came up several times — each time with a note of concern.

He may only be a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, but Secretary Chu did a good job staying as vague as possible when asked about sending our nat gas abroad: “We're not going to do anything until we make a determination what the impact would be.”

Pardon our skepticism after watching the Keystone XL project approval process get shuffled around like a deck of cards...

Advertisement

Ever Wanted Endless Income?

We all have... and a new system is proving to deliver.

Every time it's "tripped," investors walk away with secure gains.

See it in action right now. 


Believe me, dear reader, opposition is growing.

Increased LNG export means less available domestic supply, leading to higher natural gas prices here in the States.

Congress is worried that higher prices will be painful for our manufacturing industry — as well as U.S. households. And perhaps their concern isn't entirely unfounded...

gas demand sectors

Regardless, there's sure to be a tangled web of red tape surrounding the issue.

And the more obstacles that arise, the more difficult it will be for future LNG export projects to gain approval.

Of course, we've seen the kind of moves that U.S. LNG stocks can make just from the prospect of shipping to Asia...

Cheniere Energy is a perfect example. The future U.S. LNG exporter has tripled for investors since October:

LNG chart 6 montyh

The majority of people — those who are only tuned in to media headlines — don't realize that opposition is mounting toward U.S. LNG exports.

And that's exactly why there are better opportunities developing.

You see, there's a small group of natural gas players quietly taking control of nearly every aspect of a different LNG trade relationship that's growing between North America and Asia...

This deal could be worth a fortune to individual investors who are early to the game.

It won't matter how much kicking and screaming we hear from the U.S. Congress, or even the president's uncanny ability to cave to environmental pressures...

Because at the end of the day, this isn't their money. It's yours.

And it's time you took it.

Until next time,

Keith Kohl Signature

Keith Kohl

follow basic@KeithKohl1 on Twitter

A true insider in the energy markets, Keith is one of few financial reporters to have visited the Alberta tar sands. His research has helped thousands of investors capitalize from the rapidly changing face of energy. Keith connects with hundreds of thousands of readers as the Managing Editor of Energy & Capital as well as Investment Director of Angel Publishing's Energy Investor. For years, Keith has been providing in-depth coverage of the Bakken, the Haynesville Shale, and the Marcellus natural gas formations — all ahead of the mainstream media. For more on Keith, go to his editor's page.

 

Related Articles

Investing in Electric Cars

An Energy Deal Worth Trillions

Horn River Basin in British Columbia

The Keystone XL and the Northern Gateway

From the Archives...

Shell Interested in East African Assets
2012-02-22 - Brianna Panzica

John Frediksen Is One Happy Billionaire
2012-02-22 - Nathan Holl

The Shift in U.S. Oil You Had Better See Coming
2012-02-21 - Keith Kohl

How The ERS Drive System Will Change The Future
2012-02-21 - Nathan Holl

Other Causes of Groundwater Contamination
2012-02-20 - Brianna Panzica


This email was sent to ignoble.experiment@arconati.us . You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy here.

Energy and Capital, Copyright © 2012, Angel Publishing LLC, 1012 Morton St, Baltimore, MD 21201. All rights reserved. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. Energy and Capital does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you're getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info here, including our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Keep a civil tongue.

Label Cloud

Technology (1464) News (793) Military (646) Microsoft (542) Business (487) Software (394) Developer (382) Music (360) Books (357) Audio (316) Government (308) Security (300) Love (262) Apple (242) Storage (236) Dungeons and Dragons (228) Funny (209) Google (194) Cooking (187) Yahoo (186) Mobile (179) Adobe (177) Wishlist (159) AMD (155) Education (151) Drugs (145) Astrology (139) Local (137) Art (134) Investing (127) Shopping (124) Hardware (120) Movies (119) Sports (109) Neatorama (94) Blogger (93) Christian (67) Mozilla (61) Dictionary (59) Science (59) Entertainment (50) Jewelry (50) Pharmacy (50) Weather (48) Video Games (44) Television (36) VoIP (25) meta (23) Holidays (14)

Popular Posts (Last 7 Days)