There Is No Peak Oil

Forward to a Friend Having trouble viewing this issue? Click here. Refer a Friend to Energy and Capital.

There Is No Peak Oil By Nick Hodge | Wednesday, February 8th, 2012 “There is no Peak Oil,” Newt Gingrich told a crowd in Colorado this week. Newt is wrong. But he's also a politician who has to pander to whatever crowd he's in front of. In this case, he was addressing the 2012 Colorado Election Energy Summit, hosted by the Colorado Oil & Gas Association. Colorado, like North Dakota, is the middle of a shale oil boom. That's where the Niobrara shale is. It's creating jobs and wealth and investment opportunities. But Colorado — and indeed the entire shale boom — isn't defying Peak Oil as Newt and many others would have you think... Advertisement American Oil Renaissance The CEO of an American oil corporation says he's found 24 billion barrels right here on U.S. soil... This will make us a bigger producer than Saudi Arabia in the next five years. We got him on camera talking about it — and the new wealth it will create for investors. Click here to watch the video now. Clouding the Issue Former contributor to this letter Chris Nelder recently wrote a brilliant piece about this very tactic for Smart Planet called "The Politics of Peak Oil." In it, he notes: “Peak Oil” refers to the maximum rate of production of regular crude oil. Period. It’s a number. It is not a theory. It does not mean “running out of oil.” It is not the moral equivalent of Malthusianism. It is not a political movement, or a religion. It’s not a dessert topping. It is not a floor wax. It is not about oil reserves (oil that has been proved to exist and to be producible at a profit), or resources (oil that may exist in the ground, irrespective of its potential to be produced profitably). Those quantities do play a role in estimating the peak, but do not determine it in any way. “Unconventional” liquids such as biofuels, natural gas liquids, synthetic oil made from bitumen in tar sands or from kerogen in shales, and liquids made from coal or natural gas are not regular crude oil, nor are they equivalent to crude on several important counts. When you’re talking about unconventional liquids, you are not talking about oil, and lumping them in with oil does not increase the volume of oil. That’s why it’s called “Peak Oil” and not “peak liquid fuels.” When people like Gingrich say things like “There is no Peak Oil,” Nelder concludes: Either they haven’t the foggiest idea what “Peak Oil” means, nor a grip on production data (let alone the key production/reserves ratios)... or clouding the issue, and painting Peak Oil analysts as Chicken Littles, is their explicit intent. You can say Peak Oil is real while still acknowledging that North America is undergoing a major supply boom. The two aren't mutually exclusive. But it better suits their goal of political polarization to cloud the issue. Data When you look at just crude oil production — not natural gas plant liquids, or bitumen, or other liquids, or any type of reserves — the picture isn't cloudy at all. Take Saudi Arabia as the prime example. It's never produced more oil than the 9.55 million barrels per day it hit in 2005. Country/Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Saudi Production (Thousand bpd) 9,550 9,152 8,721 9,261 8,250 8,900 Sure looks like a crude oil production peak to me — or at least a gently downwardly sloping plateau. You see, the Saudis don't have the shale that's giving birth to increased North American production. Or take a look at Mexico. It's the epitome of Peak Oil, with its production down sequentially in each of the past six years. Country/Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Mexico Production (Thousand bpd) 3,423 3,255 3,075 2,839 2,645 2,621 That sure looks like a peak in production, too. In the U.S and Canada, however, production has been rising for the past few years. But they are only two countries. What happens when more countries start going the way of Saudi Arabia and Mexico, losing production every year? I told you last month that Nigeria, Venezuela, Libya, Iran, and Angola are all starting to see production slides. If the new production in the U.S. and Canada isn't enough to offset the losses in other countries, we'll have a peak in production. That's what Peak Oil is. I don't care how many trillions of barrels anyone says is here or there or offshore or technically recoverable or proven. Unless it's being produced, it's not part of the Peak Oil debate. It's kind of like colonizing the moon... You can talk about and study it all you want, but it doesn't matter until you act on it. Advertisement How to Invest in Canada's 127% "Safety Deposit Box" Would you like having secure access to $160 billion worth of untapped Yukon gold? You don't need to be a Canadian citizen — and in fact, it's much easier than you think. The free informational report with all the details can be viewed right here.  Acting On It For me, the scenario is plain and simple... If there were ample amounts of crude oil and peak production wasn't an issue, we wouldn't be spending billions upon billions to find and try to extract the harder and harder to get stuff, some of which isn't even oil, but an oil substitute made from bitumen or kerogen. If there were ample amounts of crude oil, we wouldn't need the tar sands. If there were ample amounts of crude oil, we wouldn't be fighting Russia for Arctic mineral rights. If there were ample amounts of crude oil, Brazil wouldn't be drilling holes in mountains of salt miles below the ocean's surface. But there aren't. And we need every drop of combustible fossil fuel we can generate. That's why companies operating in oil-rich areas — like the Bakken — are doing so well. And it's why we'll continue to tout them as good investments.  Yes, a North American oil boom is underway. Yes, the oil industry will continue to make new finds. Yes, investors will make obscene amounts of money from them. But unless total world production can break out of the 72-to-74-million-barrel-a-day range it's been in since 2004, Peak Oil will continue to be an issue. And by the way, total world petroleum consumption (gas, jet fuel, distillates, fuel oil, all of it) was over 85.7 million barrels per day last year. The world produced 74.098 million barrels per day. So we're already living off the “other” stuff that isn't crude. I think Newt knows as much about oil as he does about winning a presidency. Call it like you see it, Nick Hodge @nickchodge on Twitter Nick is an editor of Energy & Capital and the Investment Director of the thousands-strong stock advisory, Alternative Energy Speculator. Co-author of the best-selling book Investing in Renewable Energy: Making Money on Green Chip Stocks, his insights have been shared on news programs and in magazines and newspapers around the world. For more on Nick, take a look at his editor's page.   Related Articles Burying Peak Oil Investors Can Find It All in the Bakken Montana's Second Oil Boom Begins WikiLeaks: Saudi Oil Lies Exposed From the Archives... Proposed Bill Sets Drilling Standards 2012-02-06 - Brianna Panzica What Iran/Israel Conflict Means For the Price Of Oil 2012-02-06 - Nathan Holl It's Official: China's Rare Earth Monopoly Is Dead! 2012-02-06 - Jeff Siegel Energy and Capital's Weekend Edition 2012-02-05 - Nick Hodge Environmental Approvals Speed Up Leasing 2012-02-03 - Brianna Panzica

This email was sent to ignoble.experiment@arconati.us . You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy here. Energy and Capital, Copyright © 2012, Angel Publishing LLC, 1012 Morton St, Baltimore, MD 21201. All rights reserved. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. Energy and Capital does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law. Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you're getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info here, including our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription.