| TABLE OF CONTENTS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| August 2014 Volume 11 Number 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In this issue
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NEWS AND VIEWS | Top | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Coeliac disease: The debate on coeliac disease screening—are we there yet? Carlo Catassi & Alessio Fasano Published online: 08 July 2014 p457 | doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.119 The majority of patients with coeliac disease are undiagnosed, leading to debate about the utility of screening. The heterogeneous clinical presentation, which includes asymptomatic forms, can partially explain the difficulties faced when identifying coeliac disease. Now, Kurppa and colleagues add another element to the debate by strengthening the arguments for general screening. Full Text | PDF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PPI therapy: The small bowel, low-dose aspirin and PPIs—should we be concerned? Angel Lanas & Carlos Sostres Published online: 08 July 2014 p458 | doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.120 A new study suggests that co-prescription of low-dose aspirin and PPIs increases the incidence of small-bowel mucosal breaks. Should we be concerned about the potential negative interactions of these drugs? Or is the balance of evidence still substantially tipped towards the need for PPIs to protect against aspirin-induced upper gastrointestinal damage? Full Text | PDF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Neurogastroenterology: Neuronal correlates of placebo in chronic FGIDs QiQi Zhou & G. Nicholas Verne Published online: 08 July 2014 p460 | doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.118 Placebo analgesia is increasingly appreciated in many difficult to treat chronic functional gastrointestinal disorders such as IBS. However, investigations of interactions between psychological and biological placebo factors are still in early stages. Now, technologies have been developed that enable neural mechanisms of placebo analgesia to be studied more directly in humans. Full Text | PDF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| REVIEWS | Top | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Treatment options for acute pancreatitis Olaf J. Bakker, Yama Issa, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Marc G. Besselink, Nicolien J. Schepers, Marco J. Bruno, Marja A. Boermeester & Hein G. Gooszen Published online: 25 March 2014 p462 | doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.39 Several important changes in disease classification and improvements in the management of patients with acute pancreatitis have been achieved in the past few years. This Review provides an overview of these changes, the effect on patient management and outcome, and outlines their scientific basis. Abstract | Full Text | PDF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Radiation enteropathy—pathogenesis, treatment and prevention Martin Hauer-Jensen, James W. Denham & H. Jervoise N. Andreyev Published online: 01 April 2014 p470 | doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.46 Radiation enteropathy remains an important obstacle to uncomplicated cancer cures after radiation therapy of pelvic and abdominal malignancies. Moreover, the prevalence of radiation enteropathy in the population exceeds that of IBD. This Review introduces the clinical problem of radiation enteropathy, discusses contemporary concepts in pathogenesis, current therapeutic options and strategies for development of new radioprotective agents. Abstract | Full Text | PDF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MRI for assessing and predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer Regina G. H. Beets-Tan & Geerard L. Beets Published online: 25 March 2014 p480 | doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.41 In this Review, the authors highlight the strengths and weaknesses of MRI for response assessment after chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer, and on its ability to predict tumour response at the time of primary diagnosis. New functional magnetic resonance technology is also outlined. Abstract | Full Text | PDF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advances in the management of the explanted donor liver Maxim Nebrig, Peter Neuhaus & Andreas Pascher Published online: 22 April 2014 p489 | doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.58 In this Review, various aspects of pretransplant donor liver management are discussed, including donor preconditioning, conventional and dynamic preservation techniques and ex vivo organ viability monitoring and graft pretreatment. The technique and clinical outcomes of split-liver transplantation are evaluated. Furthermore, the literature on rare liver donor conditions with non-standard ethical or technical issues is assessed with respect to clinical relevance. Abstract | Full Text | PDF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A role for the gut microbiota in IBS Stephen M. Collins Published online: 22 April 2014 p497 | doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.40 The gut microbiota is now acknowledged to have a profound effect on human health and disease. Here, Stephen Collins explores the role of the gut microbiota in the development of IBS, describing experimental evidence and clinical observational and trial data that implicates the gut microbiota in the manifestation of IBS. Abstract | Full Text | PDF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CONSENSUS STATEMENT | Top | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic Colin Hill, Francisco Guarner, Gregor Reid, Glenn R. Gibson, Daniel J. Merenstein, Bruno Pot, Lorenzo Morelli, Roberto Berni Canani, Harry J. Flint, Seppo Salminen, Philip C. Calder & Mary Ellen Sanders Published online: 10 June 2014 p506 | doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 Probiotics are widely regarded as live microorganisms that, when administered in sufficient amounts, confer a health benefit, but guidance is needed on the most appropriate use of the term. This Consensus Statement outlines recommendations for the scope and definition of the term 'probiotic' as determined by an expert panel convened by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics in October 2013. Abstract | Full Text | PDF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *Journal Citation Reports, Thomson, 2013. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology was previously published as Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology. |
You have been sent this Table of Contents Alert because you have opted in to receive it. You can change or discontinue your e-mail alerts at any time, by modifying your preferences on your nature.com account at: www.nature.com/myaccount For further technical assistance, please contact our registration department For print subscription enquiries, please contact our subscription department For other enquiries, please contact our feedback department Nature Publishing Group | 75 Varick Street, 9th Floor | New York | NY 10013-1917 | USA Nature Publishing Group's worldwide offices: Macmillan Publishers Limited is a company incorporated in England and Wales under company number 785998 and whose registered office is located at Brunel Road, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. © 2014 Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved. |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep a civil tongue.