![]() | |
| What are you really worth? By Jason Stutman | Monday, August 11th, 2014 How much is a human being worth? The question may come across as rhetorical at first, but I assure you it isn't. I'm looking for an answer — or, better yet, a number — to put my finger on here. We may not think about it very often, but capitalism forces us to quantify human value all the time. It may be crude, and it may be crass, but that doesn't change the basic reality that we assign numbers to people to establish their worth. When it comes to corporate America, humans are just another variable in the cost-benefit equation. Now, I'm not bringing this up to get into a political discussion about wealth distribution or the merits and flaws of our current economic system. I could share my personal opinions on these matters, but that would be totally irrelevant to the intended discussion. In this forum, I'm concerned only with putting a number on worker value and seeing what that might tell us about the future of employment. See, when you assign a number to establish a person's worth, you're inherently stating what he or she isn't. If a company pays you $50,000 a year, what they're really saying is that you're not worth $51,000. Likewise, they're saying if they could pay you $49,000 to accomplish the same amount, they would. This second scenario is really what makes putting a number on human worth so interesting. It raises the question, “At which point does job automation (software and robotics) begin to overtake the human workforce?” In other words, at which point do humans become monetarily worthless? Advertisement 3 Simple Steps to Financial Freedom Soon enough, your money won't be your money any longer. Some Americans already realize this, and they're taking steps to make sure their retirements, savings, and current paychecks are protected. As the Daily Progress recently reported, "Never in the history of retirement planning have the choices offered to workers been more severely restricted or more inappropriate." Don't be a victim. It's your right to be educated... And there are THREE simple steps ANY American can follow to secure their financial freedom for the rest of their life. Check out what the three steps are right here. Crude Calculations The most obvious way to figure this out is to look at data on individual incomes. According to U.S. Census data, the average U.S. individual is worth about $40,500 a year, and half of all people are worth less than $27,000. In other words, most of the population is worth less than a four-door Nissan sedan (annually speaking).
Now, of course humans carry plenty of intrinsic worth outside the workplace. But to corporate America, those things don't really make much of a difference. All that really matters is getting work done, and getting it done at the lowest possible rate. If your employer could save money by replacing you with a machine, he would — that's just good business. This is the way it's been since the invention of the printing press, and it's the way it will continue to be until humans can no longer find suitable employment with anything short of a Ph.D. Let's assume, hypothetically, that there is a robot capable of performing work as well as workers at the bottom half of the distribution above — those valued less than $26,989. These are your fast-food cooks, counter workers, and servers. They're your cashiers, ticket takers, farm laborers, parking lot attendants, bartenders, meat packers, and so on. The day our hypothetical robot can be leased at $26,988 is the day this part of America becomes unemployed. Advertisement How to Ride America's $398 Billion Robot Revolution for 1,578% Like computers before them, robots are evolving at lightning speed... changing the world... and creating a wave of new millionaires in the process. Says Bill Gates: "If I could only pick one thing, it would have to be robots." Gates knows what he's talking about. In fact, one robot stock has already delivered a staggering 5,000% return. Now you can tap this unstoppable trend for 5, 10, even 15 times your money — maybe a whole lot more... Click here now to get a piece of the action... They Took Our Jobs! Most people aren't particularly concerned with losing their place in the workforce to a machine anytime soon, but they probably should be. Even with wages as low as they are, machines are approaching cost-effectiveness, rivaling a significant portion of U.S. employees. Just take the average cost of an industrial robot arm, for example. New robotic arms, complete with a control system, cost from $50,000 to $80,000 and have a lifespan of 12-15 years. At the most, that's an annual cost of $6,700 a year for a machine that can work all day, every day, with no need for benefits or insurance. Of course, robotic arms can only perform repetitive physical tasks, but that doesn't mean these machines aren't putting any pressure on job-seekers elsewhere... By forcing human workers away from physical labor, machines are increasing competition in other fields that require higher levels of education. A robot may not be able to do your job just yet, but it's certainly adding to the pool of those wishing to take it. Even if this weren't the case, it would still be folly to underestimate the fast-paced progression of robotic capability. If we put some trust into prestigious research institutions such as Stanford University, MIT, and Carnegie Mellon, we can expect robots to have “humanlike dexterous manipulation,” or complex hands with independent joints approaching human capability, within just five to 15 years. Once this can happen for less than $27,000 a year, the bottom half of America is going to drop out and, quite possibly, take a lot more down with them. Yes, jobs will be created in the process — but not even close to the pace at which they'll be lost. No one knows exactly when this price point will be hit, but the day is coming, that's for certain. This is why, after analyzing 702 jobs across various industries, Oxford University found that 47% are currently at risk to automation. It's also why Brussels-based think tank Bruegel found 51% of jobs in Germany are subject to automation in the next two decades and why British University Minister David Willets believes robots will “take over middle class professions” almost entirely. Some analysts go even further. Stuart Elliot of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), for example, has indicated technology has the potential to replace “workers for 80% of current jobs.” Unfortunately, dialogue around this issue has so far been too scarce. As a nation, we need to begin addressing the effect of automation on employment, and as individuals, we need to begin protecting our wealth. These things could mean the difference between a utopian future filled with leisure and a dystopian one where humans are deemed utterly worthless. Turning progress to profits, Jason Stutman Energy and Capital's tech expert, Jason Stutman has worked as an educator in mathematics, technology, and science... Before joining the Energy and Capital team, Jason served on multiple technology development committees, writing and earning grants in educational and behavioral technologies. Jason offers readers keen insights on prominent tech trends while exposing otherwise unnoticed opportunities. The Bottom Line | |
This email was sent to ignoble.experiment@arconati.us . You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy here. Energy and Capital, Copyright © 2014, Angel Publishing LLC, 111 Market Place #720, Baltimore, MD 21202. All rights reserved. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. Energy and Capital does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law. Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you're getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info here, including our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. | |
This site is an experiment in sharing news and content. Almost everything here came from email newsletters.
Sponsor
2014/08/11
What are you really worth?
@
09:13
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Label Cloud
Technology
(1464)
News
(793)
Military
(646)
Microsoft
(542)
Business
(487)
Software
(394)
Developer
(382)
Music
(360)
Books
(357)
Audio
(316)
Government
(308)
Security
(300)
Love
(262)
Apple
(242)
Storage
(236)
Dungeons and Dragons
(228)
Funny
(209)
Google
(194)
Cooking
(187)
Yahoo
(186)
Mobile
(179)
Adobe
(177)
Wishlist
(159)
AMD
(155)
Education
(151)
Drugs
(145)
Astrology
(139)
Local
(137)
Art
(134)
Investing
(127)
Shopping
(124)
Hardware
(120)
Movies
(119)
Sports
(109)
Neatorama
(94)
Blogger
(93)
Christian
(67)
Mozilla
(61)
Dictionary
(59)
Science
(59)
Entertainment
(50)
Jewelry
(50)
Pharmacy
(50)
Weather
(48)
Video Games
(44)
Television
(36)
VoIP
(25)
meta
(23)
Holidays
(14)
Popular Posts (Last 7 Days)
-
Official Rules | See Sweepstakes Facts This is your Publishers Clearing House chance to win. Can...
-
Congratulations to 2013's Ultimate Traders Package on Demand scholarship winners ! Vanessa S...
-
͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ...

Credit: Townhall Finance, U.S. Census Data
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep a civil tongue.