The Most Dangerous Dividends on Earth

Presented by Wyatt Investment Research     Friday, March 13, 2015 The Most Dangerous Dividends on Earth by Stephen Mauzy   The older I get, the more persuaded I am by the truth in a familiar maxim: It's easier for a leopard to change its spots than a person or institution to change its ways.    Others see it differently: Leopards do change their spots; people and institutions do change their ways.    At least that's my perception based on the rekindled love bestowed on the big nationwide banks. JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), Wells Fargo (NYSE: BAC) and US Bank (NYSE: USB) trade near all-time highs.  Citigroup (NYSE: C), Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) trade near multi-year highs.   In late 2008, the aforementioned banks circled the drain. Dividends were slashed and billions of dollars of investment value were lost during the greatest financial crises (caused in large part by large banks themselves) since the Great Depression. Only through the grace of God and the Federal Reserve did these banks survive.    That was then, this is now.      VISIT OUR SPONSOR Bigger Dividends than Exxon and BP   This oil company is drilling into the largest oil reserve in the Western Hemisphere... deep under the Atlantic Ocean. It's the only company that has the high-tech rigs and the sole rights to drill the "Saudi Arabia of the Sea."  It's paying out bigger dividends than Exxon and BP... in fact, it's so profitable, it rewards shareholders with unannounced "bonus" dividends.  You could be collecting up to 8 dividend payments this year, all from this one investment.     Click here for all the details.   After being slapped on the wrist and after having numerous bureaucratic fingers wagged in their direction, bankers learned a lesson – so we were told.   As the story goes, bankers are now contrite. The focus is no longer on leveraged bet-the-ranch trades to generate obscene year-end bonuses. It's about value creation for shareholders. It's about running a business conservatively to earn money to buyback shares and raise dividend payouts. It's banking 101.    That's the doe-eyed thesis investors stumble across when a pro-big-banking pundit pimps the income wonders of big-bank stocks.    But have the spots changed? JPMorgan suffered $6 billion in losses in derivatives to semantically "manage risk" in 2012. It also paid nearly $1 billion in fines to U.S. and U.K. regulators related to said risk management.    A 2013 bank exposé featured in The Atlantic provided a provocative quote from Paul Singer, who runs Elliott Associates.   "There is no major financial institution today whose financial statements provide a meaningful clue," Singer wrote to his partners in 2012.   This week Reuters reported that big banks were lobbying the Federal Reserve to buy back more shares and raise dividend payouts. That's all well and good, until you wander into the nettle of fine print. Much of the money for buybacks and higher dividends will come from issuing preferred stock, not from operating profits.   These banks, so desirous for permission to express shareholder-friendly bona fides, are essentially taking money from one set of investors and giving it to another – and at an added cost. The yield on preferred shares can be two percentage points or more higher than the yield on the common shares.  Issuing preferred shares to pay for common share dividends and buybacks is a symptom of a moribund banking system. Last year, banks in aggregate reported operating income of $151.2 billion, down 0.4% from the year before. To increase curb appeal to investors, many larger banks want simply to increase financial obligations. For common stock holders, higher dividends and higher EPS will be smoke and mirrors.    I've always believed size matters. As it relates to banking, smaller is better. Three of my favorite  banks are small, conservative operators serving hinterland markets. Their business is banking, not gaming the regulators. Borrow, lend, sell financial services, make money – that's it.    City Holding Co. (NASDAQ: CHCO) is a West Virginia-based bank with a $650 million market cap that yields 3.6%. In nearby Kentucky, Community Trust Bancorp (NASDAQ: CTBI) sports a $565 million market cap and yields 3.7%. Texas-based Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE: CFR) is the whale among the small fry, with a $4.4 billion market cap. Cullen/Frost yields 3%.   All three maintained their dividends during the 2008 market meltdown. All three continue to grow their dividend annually. Their dividends are funded by operating profits.    Boring? Probably. But with banking, the degree of titillation matters as much as size. Less is better.      Good Investing,   Stephen Mauzy Aurora, Colo.  Investor Research Institute   Click here to read more top investment ideas from Wyatt Investment Research
Disclaimer & Important Information Investor Research Institute is owned and published by Wyatt Investment Research, LLC of Richmond, Vermont. Wyatt Investment Research is neither a registered investment adviser nor a broker/dealer. Readers are advised that this electronic publication is issued solely for information purposes and should not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. We encourage you to review our full Disclaimer and Disclosure policies. To view our Disclaimer Policy, please click here. To view our Disclosure Policy, please click here. You are subscribed with the following email address: ignoble.experiment@arconati.us To unsubscribe from this newsletter, please click here.	Copyright (c) 2015 Investor Research Institute| Privacy Policy 65 Railroad Street Richmond, VT 05477 PO Box 790