Good morning. We're covering Times critics' favorite films of 2023 — as well as Gaza, George Santos and female magicians.
A good year for moviesI found myself at the movies this year more often than last. The data suggests that I'm not alone. The number of tickets that U.S. movie theaters sold this year is up 23 percent compared to 2022, according to The Numbers, which tracks film industry statistics. With a month left to go, the domestic box office has already grossed $800 million more than it did last year, according to Box Office Mojo. And though neither metric has yet rebounded to prepandemic levels, it finally feels like the movies are, in some sense, back. Maybe it was the last gasp of widespread Covid precautions. Maybe it was the monotony of at-home streaming or just the desire to finally get off the couch. Maybe it was the popcorn. But I suspect that much of the reason Americans flocked to theaters this year had to do with the quality and variety of what was on offer there. A quick scan of The New York Times's list of the year's best movies makes the point. The films, picked by the critics Manohla Dargis and Alissa Wilkinson, span a number of genres, including dramas and biopics. They came from legacy studios, tech companies and independent studios alike. They're the work of veteran directors like Wes Anderson and Steve McQueen, as well as new ones like A.V. Rockwell and Celine Song. What electrified our critics this year? For one thing, they recoiled at the "ordinary evil" — as Alissa terms it — at the center of the Martin Scorsese film "Killers of the Flower Moon," which chronicles a spate of greed-based murders against members of the Osage Nation in the 1920s. Our critics also lauded several visually striking, sharply observed documentaries, including one that follows a Chilean journalist's descent into Alzheimer's, and another that explores trans and nonbinary identity. Both Manohla and Alissa make the point that originality, freshness and subverted expectations seem to have won Americans' wallets this year, not just the critics' praise. Instead of an action-adventure blockbuster or franchise sequel, the year's top-grossing movie was Greta Gerwig's technicolor-pink "Barbie." The "Barbenheimer" phenomenon — a pop-cultural fusion of Gerwig's movie and the Christopher Nolan film "Oppenheimer," which also made our critics' lists — became a meme-able magnet for theatergoers, myself included. The movies rebounded this year despite the labor strikes that paralyzed Hollywood for months. Still, the resurgence doesn't settle all questions about the future of the industry, like whether theaters can fully recover their pre-Covid luster or audiences have lastingly turned the corner on big-budget superhero C.G.I.-fests. But for now, as Manohla concludes, 2023 was "a terrific movie year." I can't wait for the sequel. For more
Israel-Hamas War
George Santos
International
California
Other Big Stories
"A great step toward our survival": Atef Abu Saif, of the Palestinian Authority, records his escape from northern to southern Gaza. As funding is cut, scholars want to show society that there is value in the humanities. But trying to justify the discipline's existence has only politicized it, Agnes Callard writes. Here are columns by Thomas Friedman on a permanent cease-fire in Gaza, Maureen Dowd on OpenAI and Ross Douthat on fertility in South Korea. The Sunday question: Was Henry Kissinger a war criminal? After Kissinger fostered the 1973 coup in Chile and supported the dictatorship that followed, Ariel Dorfman imagined that the former secretary of state "would stand in a court of law and answer for his crimes," he writes in The Los Angeles Times, adding that it was "a dream that vanished with his death." But the key to understanding Kissinger is his insistence "that foreign policy was nearly always about making choices between evils," Niall Ferguson writes in Bloomberg.
A lonely pursuit: Few stage magicians are women. A new generation of performers wants to change that. Faux fir: Are fake Christmas trees normal now? "You're overreacting": See the eight things you should never say to your partner, according to therapists. Glazed heist: A woman thought she was stealing a van. She got thousands of doughnuts as well. Vows: They looked like twins. Lives Lived: Larry Fink's intimate black-and-white photographs were both social commentary on class and an exuberant document of the human condition. He died at 82.
Earlier this year, I spoke with Colin Koopman, the author of the influential book "How We Became Our Data," about how our personal data can dictate our lives. Can you explain more what it means to say that we have become our data? Because a natural reaction to that might be, well, no, I'm my mind, I'm my body, I'm not numbers in a database. My claim is that your data has become something that is increasingly inescapable in the sense of being obligatory for your average person living out their life. It now becomes possible to say, "These data points are essential to who I am." A lot of people have that relationship to their credit score, for example. It's both very important to them and very mysterious. But what does the use of our data in that way in the first place suggest, in the biggest possible sense, about our place in society? We're in this position of, I'm taking my best guess how to optimize my credit score or, if I own a small business, how to optimize my search-engine ranking. We're simultaneously loading more and more of our lives into these systems and feeling that we have little control or understanding of how these systems work. Isn't it necessarily the case that there have to be collection and flows and formatting of personal information that we're not going to be fully aware of or understand? How would the world operate otherwise? Industrialized liberal democracies have a decent track record at putting in place policies, regulations and laws that guide the development and use of highly specialized technologies. That basic regulatory approach is a valuable one, but we've run up against the wall of unbridled data acquisition by these huge corporations. They've set up this model of, You don't understand what we do, but trust us that you need us, and we're going to vacuum up all your data in the process. Read more of the interview here. More from the magazine
Endgame: Harry and Meghan's sympathetic biographer, Omid Scobie, writes a critical view of palace machinations and calls the royals "tone-deaf, racist and financially reckless." Puzzle: Can you find the hidden titles? Take our quiz. Our editors' picks: "Skeletons in the Closet," a novel about corruption, and eight other books. Times best sellers: Britney Spears's memoir "The Woman in Me" reclaims the top spot on the latest hardcover nonfiction list.
Use these flannel sheets and blankets for winter. Watch the 50 best shows on Netflix right now. Infuse this cake with Thai tea.
What to Watch For
What to Cook This Week
If your Thanksgiving leftovers are depleted, it's time to get cooking again. Genevieve Ko has picks for dinner in this week's Five Weeknight Dishes newsletter, including jerk chicken meatballs, soba noodles in ginger broth and warm roasted carrot and barley salad.
Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangrams were chimichanga and machining. Can you put eight historical events — including the first hot air balloon, the creation of the N.F.L. and the reign of Queen Nefertiti — in chronological order? Take this week's Flashback quiz. And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Sudoku and Connections. Thanks for spending part of your weekend with The Times. Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023/12/03
The Morning: The year’s best movies
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts (Last 7 Days)
-
Congratulations to 2013's Ultimate Traders Package on Demand scholarship winners ! Vanessa S...
-
Search is invited in. Training bots may not be. ...
-
Wake up with Good Morning America ...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep a civil tongue.