The Sunday Spotlight: Buffett's $325 Billion Mistake

Can the Oracle ignore what’s in front of his nose?  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

May 04, 2025 WEBSITE | UNSUBSCRIBE

Editor’s Note: Warren Buffett has never been afraid to sit on the sidelines when markets look frothy. But with Berkshire Hathaway now holding a record $325 billion in cash, some investors are starting to ask: is he being cautious… or missing something big? In this Sunday Spotlight, Sean Ring of The Morning Reckoning looks at one asset Buffett has turned to before — and why his successors might make the call that he won’t. The Sunday Spotlight: Buffett's $325 Billion Mistake SEAN RING Hi Reader, Warren Buffett, the Oracle of Omaha, is facing a peculiar problem these days: he has too much cash. Berkshire Hathaway is sitting on an eye-watering $325 billion in dry powder, a record high. Historically, Buffett has always been eager to deploy capital when the odds are in his favor. But today, even he admits he’s struggling to find value in this overvalued market. Which leads to a fascinating question: could Buffett turn to silver, or even silver miners, as a way to put that cash to work? To answer that, let’s take a short trip back to the late 1990s when Buffett made one of his more unconventional moves. Buffett’s Big Silver Bet in the 1990s In 1997 and 1998, through Berkshire Hathaway’s General Re subsidiary, Buffett bought about 130 million ounces of physical silver. That’s roughly 20% of the world’s known above-ground supply at the time. His rationale was Classic Buffett: supply and demand. Silver had been beaten down for years, with central banks selling their reserves and industrial demand remaining relatively stable. Buffett saw the price, around $4.40 per ounce, as disconnected from the underlying fundamentals. Buffett’s mentor Benjamin Graham once told him, “In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.” He figured silver’s actual value would eventually be “weighed” and the price would rise accordingly. Of course, Buffett was right. Silver prices did move higher, peaking around $7 per ounce in the late 90s. Depending on the price Buffett closed the trade, he made anywhere from $208 million to $328 million. However, the trade attracted regulatory scrutiny. The CFTC investigated whether Buffett had cornered the market. While they found no wrongdoing, the experience likely left Buffett with a bad taste in his mouth. How 1998 Relates to 2025 Today, silver finds itself in a similar situation. Industrial demand for silver is surging, especially for solar panels, electric vehicles, and advanced electronics. Yet mine supply is struggling to keep up. Add in a general underinvestment in new mining projects, and you’ve got a classic supply-demand imbalance brewing. Meanwhile, institutional ownership of silver remains very low. Hedge funds, pension funds, and endowments aren’t piling into silver the way they are with equities or even gold. In short, the fundamentals look tight, and the market doesn’t fully reflect that yet, just like in the late 1990s. Silver, from January 1997 to March 1998; Credit: StockCharts.com In the late 90s, silver was trapped in a narrow band before Buffett’s buying helped nudge it higher. Today, silver has been rangebound, first between $20.50 and $25.50, and second from $27.50 to $34.50. This is despite booming demand and constrained supply. It’s not history repeating, but it’s history rhyming. Why Buffett Probably Won’t Buy Silver Miners As tempting as the setup is, there are a few big reasons why Buffett likely won’t be backing up the truck into silver miners. First, Buffett loves businesses with durable competitive advantages, or “moats,” predictable earnings, and strong management. Mining is a tricky business — costs fluctuate wildly, mines get depleted, and governments change royalty schemes overnight. All of that makes mining an unpredictable venture, something Buffett typically shuns. Second, Buffett experienced the impact of commodity price swings firsthand with silver in the 1990s and again with oil, when he invested heavily in ConocoPhillips just before the 2008 crash. Those experiences taught him that commodities are hard to predict and even harder to control. Third, Buffett is 94 years old. He’s thinking more than ever about Berkshire’s legacy and stability. A big, volatile bet on miners just doesn’t fit that narrative. What About Buffett’s Lieutenants? However, it’s worth noting that Todd Combs and Ted Weschler, the two managers Buffett handpicked to steer Berkshire’s massive investment portfolio, have more flexibility. They each control approximately $20 billion in assets and have demonstrated a willingness to venture into tech, fintech, and other sectors Buffett has traditionally avoided. Could they see an asymmetric bet in silver miners? Absolutely. Especially if they view it not as a commodity play, but as a long-term investment in critical metals needed for the alleged green transition. Companies like Wheaton Precious Metals or Franco-Nevada, which operate on a royalty and streaming model rather than directly mining, might be more appealing. These businesses generate predictable cash flows without the operational headaches of digging metal out of the ground. Wrap Up While the silver setup today echoes the opportunity Buffett spotted in the late 1990s, it’s unlikely that we’ll see Berkshire Hathaway dive into silver miners in a meaningful way. Buffett himself might pass. The “official” chances? I’d peg it at less than 5%. But don’t count out Berkshire’s next generation. In a world where tangible assets are becoming more valuable — and where silver’s importance to technology and energy is only growing — a small, strategic allocation to royalty-based silver plays could quietly find its way into the Berkshire portfolio. For now, Buffett will likely continue to do what he’s always done best: wait patiently for the perfect pitch. Because, as he once said, “The trick in investing is just to sit there and watch pitch after pitch go by and wait for the one right in your sweet spot.” And if silver miners aren’t quite there yet, rest assured, Buffett is still watching… and waiting. All the best, Sean Ring for Truth & Trends

Legendary billion-dollar former hedge fund manager Enrique Abeyta predicts that Elon Musk's new invention will revolutionize the AI industry, making a lot of people rich in the process... All while triggering a crash of up to 50% in the next 12 months in Nvidia and other popular AI stocks. Click here to learn which stocks to buy and which to avoid AND get details on what he’s calling “the Nvidia killer”.

☰ ⊗ UPDATE PREFERENCES Contact Us © 2025 Paradigm Press, LLC. 1001 Cathedral Street, Baltimore MD 21202. By submitting your email address, you consent to Paradigm Press, LLC. delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your Truth & Trends e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from Truth & Trends, feel free to click here. Please note: the mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so do not reply to this message. We welcome comments or suggestions at AskGreg@paradigmpressgroup.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, contact us here or call (844)-731-0984. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We allow the editors of our publications to recommend securities that they own themselves. However, our policy prohibits editors from exiting a personal trade while the recommendation to subscribers is open. In no circumstance may an editor sell a security before subscribers have a fair opportunity to exit. The length of time an editor must wait after subscribers have been advised to exit a play depends on the type of publication. All other employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Truth & Trends is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. Please read our Privacy Statement. If you are having trouble receiving your Truth & Trends subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by whitelisting Truth & Trends. Reference Number: 000055791417